2 field 4 times back to the video referee cited a huge controversy

Portugal on Mexico, Chile, Cameroon two wars, video referee made four important penalties. However, the game suspended many times, the video referee with too long and led to the scene of the confusion, and many media, the fans expressed dissatisfaction with the technology.

Russia's first round of the Confederations Cup in New Zealand, the video referee has not been tested, but Portugal on the Mexican war only 21 minutes, Pepe shot the ball into the net after the referee in contact with the video referee, and ultimately, the video referee that Pepe offside first, invalid goal. "Mirror" pointed out that the Portuguese players gathered together, the court looks very confusing. The slow motion shows that the video referee made the right decision, despite spending so much time to make the decision frustrating.

The Mirror further analyzes the difference between the video referee and the assistant referee. "When the ball was passed back to the restricted area, four Portuguese players, including Pepe, seemed to be offside." However, the cut was not raised Their own flag, Real Madrid defender was able to put the ball into the net. "NBC pointed out that" the referee spent 53 seconds to make a decision, but slow show that four people are in the offside position. "This is not the video referee this The only referee again, in the Cedric for Portugal into the second ball, the game again suspended, the referee once again asked the video referee involved, this time the video referee made a goal effective penalty.

Later, Chile's war against Cameroon, the video referee penalty sparked a greater controversy, Vargas in the first half before the end of the ball alone into the net, the Chilean players happily surrounded together to celebrate, however, The referee has shown that the goal is invalid, which triggered the Chilean players angry. Slow motion shows, when Vidal direct pass, Vargas and Cameroon defender at the same level, compared with Portugal's war against Mexico, the video referee of this penalty is clearly more controversial.

At the end of the game, there was a controversial scene again. Sanchez was single-handedly closed, and Vargas had a break. The referee first thought that Vargas offside in the first ball is invalid, then the video referee corrected the referee's penalty, the final decision to score effective. This dramatic situation led to a greater controversy in the video referee.

The video referee's penalty reduced the controversy, but the fluency of the game was also affected https://www.lolga.com/fifa-18-coins. "The technology has caused a lot of confusion on the pitch, and it has wasted too much time," said the fans, "and that's even if everyone knows how video technology is going on, "In NBC 's message board, there are fans who expressed dissatisfaction," This is another game that has been dominated by VARs. In fact, I think video technology should not be used for football at all. "" Even if it can make the right The decision will be devastating. "

"Mirror" polls show that 40% of fans agree with the video playback technology, and that this is the direction of football development, but there are 35% of fans do not recognize this technology, the reason is too complicated, the other 25% of the fans Recognize this technology, but that the technology also need to upgrade.

In the World Championship before the 52 games, the video referee made 12 penalties, however, the Confederations Cup 2 days within 3 games, the video referee made four penalties. However, this technology is not mature enough reality, FIFA has also not made whether the World Cup in 2018 to use the final decision of this technology. Obviously, this technology reduces the controversy, but also affects the fluency of the game.